#1 SEP 22, 2017 · 8 yr ago
Over the pass few days I have been watching the OS, and I have been enjoying it. :D However, what I noticed is that some of the ideas used in the NS have conflicted with what the OS has established for the franchise. So I wanted your opinions to see if the following instances have went with or against the story.
#1: "Song of the Petalars"
In "The Unholy Alliance", there is a scene where Lion-O tries to hunt some animals with his Sword, but the Sword rejects his commands. Then Jaga appears and tells him the Sword will not wantonly commit evil. (Btw, if you so strong that you can throw a tree like a javelin, you probably do not need a sword to hunt.) Anyway, a possible conflict comes up in "Song of the Petalars", when the Cats are fighting the lizards in Briar Wood and Lion-O uses the Sword to slay Khamai. Since Lion-O was not in a situation where killing was his remaining option, does this scene conflict with what was exemplified in "The Unholy Alliance"?
Also, if NS Lion-O was in a situation where: 1) the other Cats, or anybody else for that matter, would not able to help him, 2) he did not have the Spirit Stone to create a force field, and 3) the Eye in the Sword was not powerful enough to take whoever down, would it still break from the narrative if he used the Sword to kill as an absolute last resort?
(Funny how OS Lion-O could use the Sword to help him for the first two stipulations in a spot like the one above.)
#2: "Birth of the Blades"
In this episode, we learn that the Sword and Gauntlet of Plun-Darr was forged by destroying a star and killing billions of lives. Later, we find out that the Sword and Gauntlet of Omens was made from the remnants of the same material. Here is the ironic thing about this: Mumm-Ra's weapon is deemed evil, but The Sword of Omens is deemed good. Now in the OS, it was established that the Sword was a weapon of righteousness, correct? So in the NS how can this be true when the substance used to make the Sword was obtained from an unrighteous act?
I think somebody royally goofed on that one. :frown
#1: "Song of the Petalars"
In "The Unholy Alliance", there is a scene where Lion-O tries to hunt some animals with his Sword, but the Sword rejects his commands. Then Jaga appears and tells him the Sword will not wantonly commit evil. (Btw, if you so strong that you can throw a tree like a javelin, you probably do not need a sword to hunt.) Anyway, a possible conflict comes up in "Song of the Petalars", when the Cats are fighting the lizards in Briar Wood and Lion-O uses the Sword to slay Khamai. Since Lion-O was not in a situation where killing was his remaining option, does this scene conflict with what was exemplified in "The Unholy Alliance"?
Also, if NS Lion-O was in a situation where: 1) the other Cats, or anybody else for that matter, would not able to help him, 2) he did not have the Spirit Stone to create a force field, and 3) the Eye in the Sword was not powerful enough to take whoever down, would it still break from the narrative if he used the Sword to kill as an absolute last resort?
(Funny how OS Lion-O could use the Sword to help him for the first two stipulations in a spot like the one above.)
#2: "Birth of the Blades"
In this episode, we learn that the Sword and Gauntlet of Plun-Darr was forged by destroying a star and killing billions of lives. Later, we find out that the Sword and Gauntlet of Omens was made from the remnants of the same material. Here is the ironic thing about this: Mumm-Ra's weapon is deemed evil, but The Sword of Omens is deemed good. Now in the OS, it was established that the Sword was a weapon of righteousness, correct? So in the NS how can this be true when the substance used to make the Sword was obtained from an unrighteous act?
I think somebody royally goofed on that one. :frown
♥ 1 LIKE